Stimulus spending at home and abroad

by Fergus Hanson - 6 February 2009 12:41PM

Following Sam's post on stimulus packages, my main query to the economists out there is why the Australian Government is embarking on such a large stimulus package when the Reserve Bank still has room to cut rates? Each rate cut is effectively a tax cut to millions of Australians. Why wouldn’t we use this option before turning to taxpayer funded handouts that will lump us with a huge debt?

Countries like the US and UK are looking at massive stimulus packages because they have no more room to cut rates and their banks are in a shambles. Australia doesn't have either of those problems. Is this more about the fact the RBA might be in disagreement with the Government on the scale of the crisis? 

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.